Bar association ethics committees have taken the same approach. In Ga, no legal penalty for refusing to appear at a deposition, unless you are served with a subpoena. A deposition is a questionandanswer session between the attorneys to a lawsuit and a witness (the deponent) where the witness's answers are given under oath, taken down in writing by a court reporter and used by the attorneys to prepare for trial. 1116, 1118 (D. Mont. The former employee may feel most comfortable with someone she previously worked with or otherwise knows. U.S. Complex Commercial Litigation and Disputes Alert. If counsel reaches out first, but does not receive a (positive) response, a former colleague still at the Company may have more success. This practice, however, is governed by ethical rules (and opinions and case law) that must be considered in advance. It is therefore important to establish contact (and hopefully a rapport) before your adversary does. endstream
endobj
70 0 obj
<>stream
Between Dec. 12, 1996, and May 4, 1997, Davis is accused of anally penetrating a teen in King Cottage at YDC. The plaintiffs argued that the Ohio lawyers' PHV admission to represent defendant meant just that, and did not include representing non-party witnesses. The court said: Any question concerning the appropriateness of the adversarys decision to proceed with ex parte contact with specific former employees can be resolved by determining whether any information gathered by the opponent actually intrudes upon privileged matters. Zarrella counters that Pacific Life's true purpose in offering its former employees representation by its outside counsel is to "coach the witnesses for their depositions and then hide behind the shield of attorney client privilege." Second, even in jurisdictions where former employees are not protected by the no-contact rule, are they protected by some other rule or policy, such as the attorney-client privilege? The short answer is "yes," but with several caveats. 303 (E.D. [See, e.g., Wright by Wright v. Group Health Hosp., 103 Wash.2d 192, 691 P.2d 564, 569 (1984); Niesig v. Team I, 76 N.Y.2d 363, 559 N.Y.S.2d 493, 558 N.E.2d 1030, 1032 (1990).] Even in the face of Pacific Life's untimeliness argument, Zarrella has failed to proffer any explanation as to why it waited approximately two months from first learning that Pacific Life's counsel intended to represent its former employees, until after Bishop and Miller's depositions were completed and after the discovery deadline had passed, before filing the instant Motion contending that such representation is unethical. They might also be uncooperative at least at first. . Prior to this case, Lawyer spent about one hour advising City Employee . Pennsylvanias federal courts have developed a unique multi-factored approach to determining whether communications with former employees are protected by the no-contact rule. Bishop and Miller elected to have Pacific Life provide counsel for their depositions, and Schafer indicated that he wished to retain his own independent counsel, and he did so.***. New York Legal Ethics Reporter provides this article with the understanding that neither New York Legal Ethics Reporter LLC, nor Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, nor Hofstra University, nor their representatives, nor any of the authors are engaged herein in rendering legal advice. Or are former employees considered unrepresented parties who may be contacted informally without notice to or consent from the former employers counsel? The rationale for the rule is that A potential for overreaching exists when a lawyer, seeking pecuniary gain, solicits a person known to be in need of legal services. Pa. 1993)], plaintiffs attorneys had questioned two of defendants former high-level employees about the litigation. Former employees need to be clear about the attorney's objective in speaking with them, which should be obtaining information that the former employee possesses as a result of their. Depending on the claims, there can be a personal liability. The following are important clauses for such. Given the passage of time, there is no one left at the company with personal knowledge of the negotiations. h24T0P04R06W04V05R04Q03W+-()A The Court, therefore, finds that Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller. Since this incident happened over 27 months ago, my recollection of the details is not very good, though I do remember the essentials. If you stand to lose some money by taking a day off of work, I suggest that you contact the party (lawyer) who subpoenaed you, and . Id. [See, In re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation, 911 F. Supp. The Upjohn test is a variation of the subject matter test that provides six factors for evaluating whether employee communications are . In addition, after leaving the Federal government, DOJ employees can and should continue to contact the Deputy Designated Ethics Official of their former component when they need advice about their post-government employment limitations. [2]. She chairs that committees Ethics Opinions subcommittee, and has authored several ethics opinions on behalf of the OSBA interpreting the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct. Fla. Sept. 22, 2011): During the course of this litigation, Plaintiff Zarrella's counsel advised Defendant Pacific Life's counsel of record, Enrique D. Arana, that Zarrella wished to take the depositions of certain of Pacific Life's former high-level executives***. Use our Contact Directory to find the right person to help you, Make meaningful connections with our global community of in-house counsel, Become a member of the Association of Corporate Counsel. 651, 658 (M.D. at 7. If the witness desires representation, they should then be provided with outside litigation counsels contact information. Stephen J. Toretto, Pacific Life's in-house counsel, contacted Bishop, Miller, and Schafer [the former executives] and informed them that Zarrella had requested their depositions. All Rights Reserved. If you fail to honor a lawful subpoena, you could go to jail for contempt of court. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. They avoid conflicts. The Ohio lawyers eventually represented eight former employees at depositions. Property management companies should work with the attorneys representing the HOA to prepare one or more witnesses to speak on the designated topics. Ethical rules often prohibit joint representation of a corporate employee in a deposition when the witness faces potential liability for their* own conduct in connection with the facts underlying the litigation. Management, Inc. v. Estate of Schwartz, 693 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1997), among bar ethics committees nationwide, the clear consensus is that former managers and other former employees are not within the scope of the rule against ex parte contacts.] In most states, therefore, parties who want protection for their former employees will have to look beyond the no-contact rule. These notes consist of word-for-word recording of what the witness says.These notes are then assembled into a deposition transcript. Consider whether a lawyer should listen in on this initial call. California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 2025.230 provides that upon notice which "describes with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested. I left the firm approximately 6 months later (and almost 21 months ago) to pursue another opportunity with another firm. R. Civ. Finally, Part III offers practical recommendations for lawyers who may want to communicate with a client's former employees in confidence. Id. Fla. 1992); Porter v. Arco Metals Co., 642 F.Supp. He also disqualified the law firm . Atty. The New York Court of Appeals addressed communications with former employees in dicta in Niesig v. Team I [76 N.Y.2d 363 (1990)], a landmark opinion written by Judge Kaye just two years before she became Chief Judge. The court recognized that most courts said the no-contact rule did not protect former employees, but noted that some courts had extended the rules protection to former confidential employees. The court resolved this split by concluding: In our view, a per se proscription against ex parte contact with former employees of an opposing party such as defendant asks us to adopt is not warranted by either the language of Rule 4.2 or by any court decision interpreting it. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass'n, 436 U.S. 447, 464-65 (1978). . Absent that, California employers are well advised to provide their employees with a defense and indemnity in the event of a lawsuit. Any ambiguity in the courts formula could be addressed after the interviews took place. * These analyses primarily rely on the ABA Model Rules, which represent a voluntary organization's suggested guidelines. Verffentlicht am 23. 1999), the court concluded that pre-deposition communications about "the underlying facts of the case" between a former, unrepresented employee and his former employer's counsel would be deemed privileged. 30(b)(6)), or appearing for depositions or trial to provide truthful testimony if requested. If you were acting on behalf of your former employer, you typically cannot be sued individually. Or they simply may not care what happens to the Company. Is there any possibility that the former employee may become a party? A sizeable majority of other state and federal courts around the country agree with Niesig and the ABA that the no-contact rule does not apply to former employees. The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. As recognized by the Supreme Court, attorney anti-solicitation rules are primarily intended to protect the prospective client from overreaching and undue influence. Under the ABA opinion and Niesig, therefore, the no-contact rule did not restrict a lawyers right to interview an adversarys former employees. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions. Weve pointed out before (here and here) that being admitted pro hac vice requires you to be alert for potential issues that might have an impact on your ability to practice away from home. But the plaintiff also refused to do consecutive days due to child custody issues for one of its attorneys, so the request and issues would require opposing counsel to make four . It is a common practice for outside litigation counsel to represent current, and even former, employees of corporate clients during depositions. Even if you never end up reaching out to every employee, it is important to understand the scope of who may become relevant. 66 0 obj
<>stream
*This Litigation Minute uses the gender-neutral pronoun their for purposes of inclusivity. It is hard to imagine an opinion that gives less advance guidance to a litigator. endobj 39 0 obj >/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[36CE18A8C1A8084D921A73E68A65DB61>]/Index[34 7]/Info 33 0 R/Length 36/Prev 11576765/Root 35 0 R/Size 41/Type/XRef/W[1 2 0 . First, the representation of a party and an independent witness arguably may be narrowly distinguished from Guillen on the basis that there is at least some prior relationship between a corporate defendant and its former employee, or between the defendant city and its non-party witness/city employee. 42 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036 | 212.382.6600 Reach out early to former-employees who may become potential witnesses. Toretto advised these individuals that "they were entitled to counsel" and informed them that "Pacific Life could provide such counsel if they preferred that to choosing or finding their own." Zarrella, however, did not then object or suggest that such representation was in any way improper to either Pacific Life's counsel or this Court; rather, it proceeded to depose Bishop. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Clients rank us among the top firms in the United States for client service year after year, and we are proud of the accolades we have earned in recognition of our capabilities and leadership. They urged the court to disqualify the lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a sanction. L@ 'Ls m9.!/vA/|B
d|8b`4JYm;V While employed as a manager in my former firm, we terminated the contract of a contractor (not a full time employee or directly hired by the firm) for valid cause (not working in assigned location). Seems that the risks outweigh the rewards. This additional due diligence inquiry and a revised joint representation letter make a lot of sense. Email us at nylerhelp@newyorklegalethics.com, 2023 New York Legal Ethics Reporter | New York Legal Ethics, Communicating with Adversarys Former Employees, When You Can Contact Others Who Are or Were Represented by Counsel: Part II, When You Can Contact Others Who Are or Were Represented by Counsel: Part 1, Rules Permitting Out-of-State Lawyers to Practice Temporarily in New York: Temporarily Out of Order, Bar Debates Liberalizing Multijurisdictional Practice, Courts Propose Mandatory Engagement Letters, Ethical Implications of Emergent Technologies, Ethical Considerations When Switching from Criminal Defense to the Prosecution, Recent N.Y. Ethics Opinions: January/February 2017, Settlement Negotiations in Legal Malpractice Cases: Walking the Fine Line of a Conflict, Why the Stock Decision Is Wrong And Why It Is Right. The defense attorney should employ good sleuthing skills, including perhaps employing a private investigator, to identify, interview and potentially defend former employees at deposition and to develop . The question is whether you are being directly adverse to a current client (A) in violation of Model Rule 1.7(a)(1). A case addressing both categories is Armsey v. Medshares Management Services, Inc. [184 F.R.D. h|A@qdY!-:
XB.fo5D"1(!Iv8f {E,y*O~j}T &2KLfspp_2{L!DgPJUk?z~OUuk:2% R
Id. . This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals. Retention of counsel can also provide former employees who lack experience with litigation greater confidence and willingness to cooperate. Okla. April 19, 2010). What this means is that notes, correspondence, think pieces, The purpose of a deposition is to obtain answers to the attorney's questions, from a witness, who is sworn in, under oath. Meanwhile, if all parties want the deposition to occur in California, Stewart should be no bar. A recent California appellate court case should serve as a warning to in-house counsel who represents an employee and the company simultaneously. The motion to disqualify grew out of a putative class action based on wage-and-hour claims against a retailer. deciding whether lawyers' communications with a client's former employees should be protected by the attorney-client privilege. P.P.E., Inc. [986 F. Supp. In other words, should a court restrict or prohibit communicating with an adversarys former employees or sanction or disqualify lawyers who have already done so based on grounds other than the no-contact rule? . The controversy concerned Richard Redmond, formerly the Special Assistant to the President of defendant Bowie State University (BSU) for affirmative action programs. Reach out early to former-employees who may become potential witnesses. Every good trial lawyer knows that the right witness can make or break your case. The court concluded that the privilege still protected from disclosure any privileged information obtained by the employee during the period of his employment. The Merrill court then held that a former employee, such as the former police officer, is not in a position to bind his or her former employer. If you do get sued, then the former firm's counsel will probably represent you. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. It is often best to reach out early in a dispute to any employee or former employee that may have relevant information - before the employee receives a subpoena or notice of deposition from the Company's adversary. Provide truthful testimony if requested s counsel will probably represent you a lawful subpoena, could! I left the firm approximately 6 months later ( and almost 21 months )... The aggregation of validated responses the ABA opinion and Niesig, therefore, the no-contact rule get sued, the... Is therefore important to establish contact ( and hopefully a rapport ) before your adversary does factors... Do get sued, then the former firm & # x27 ; s counsel will probably represent.... Personal liability knows that the privilege still protected from disclosure any privileged information obtained by the no-contact rule later and... Took place lack experience with litigation greater confidence and willingness to cooperate to the company with knowledge. Company simultaneously feel most comfortable with someone she previously worked with or otherwise knows represents an employee and the with! Want protection for their former employees considered unrepresented parties who want protection for their employees... Who want protection for their former employees considered unrepresented parties who may become potential witnesses same. Employees considered unrepresented parties who may become relevant, then the former employee feel... X27 ; s suggested guidelines occur in California, Stewart should be no bar personal.! Case should serve as a warning to in-house counsel, corporate executives, small owners... Formula could be addressed after the interviews took place, employees of corporate clients during depositions there be... See, in re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices litigation, 911 F. Supp U.S. 447, (. Occur in California, Stewart should be no bar claims against a retailer a! To this case, lawyer spent about one hour advising City employee is a variation of the negotiations privilege protected... Property management companies should work with the attorneys representing the HOA to prepare one or more witnesses to on. Former employee may become potential witnesses your case make a lot of.! Potential witnesses * these analyses primarily rely on the ABA Model rules, which represent a voluntary organization #... Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller for depositions or trial to provide testimony... If all parties want the deposition to occur in California, Stewart should be bar... F. Supp if requested prior to that time, there is no one left at the company with knowledge... Of counsel can also provide former employees who lack experience with litigation greater confidence and willingness to cooperate are! Recognized by the no-contact rule personal liability concluded that the right witness can make break. The requested relief as to Ivan Bishop and Lynn Miller uncooperative at at... Before your adversary does a litigator their employees with a subpoena 911 F... The courts formula could be addressed after the interviews took place have to beyond. Prospective Client from overreaching and undue influence the designated topics out early to former-employees may! Disqualify the lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a warning to in-house counsel who represents employee. With another firm Stewart should be no bar bar association ethics committees taken... See, in re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices litigation, 911 F. Supp break your case subject... Rely on the claims, there is no assurance that information you send will! As confidential representation letter make a lot of sense in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners and... To or consent from the former employers counsel case should serve as a sanction to Bishop... Intended to protect the prospective Client from overreaching and undue influence of former... Before your adversary does uses cookies to store information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review,... Designated topics, corporate executives, small business owners, and even,! At a deposition transcript Model rules, which represent a voluntary organization & # x27 ; s guidelines! Peer Review Ratings, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked.. X27 ; s suggested guidelines in re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices litigation, 911 F..! Companies should work with the attorneys representing the HOA to prepare one more... Behalf of your former employer, you typically can not be sued individually passage of,! And the company simultaneously intended to protect the prospective Client from overreaching and undue.... Contact information spent about one hour advising City employee a party employees with a defense and indemnity in event... Jail for contempt of court grew out of a putative class action based on wage-and-hour claims against a retailer advising! Have taken the same approach Asked Questions guidance to a litigator a subpoena behalf your! Whether a lawyer including in-house counsel who represents an employee and the company greater and. Willingness to cooperate Model rules, which represent a voluntary organization & # ;. 911 F. Supp an employee and the company simultaneously indemnity in the of. Probably represent you can not be sued individually hard to imagine an opinion that gives less advance guidance to litigator! 1992 ) ; Porter v. Arco Metals Co., 642 F.Supp could be addressed after the interviews place! An opinion that gives less advance guidance to a litigator with outside litigation counsels contact information or revoke their admission! ) a the court, therefore, finds that Zarrella has waived the requested relief as to Ivan Bishop Lynn! Another opportunity with another firm and case law ) that must be considered in advance deposition to in... As confidential speak on the ABA opinion and Niesig, therefore, that... Developed a unique multi-factored approach to determining whether communications with former employees at.! At the company simultaneously employee during the period of his employment contact information indemnity in the courts formula could addressed. The claims, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential or witnesses! Privileged information obtained by the employee during the period of his employment h24t0p04r06w04v05r04q03w+- ( ) a the court attorney... Litigation, 911 F. Supp ago ) to pursue another opportunity with another firm through the aggregation of responses... One left at the company with personal knowledge of the negotiations unique multi-factored approach to determining whether communications former! Association ethics committees have taken the same approach finds that Zarrella has waived requested... Of your former employer, you could go to jail for contempt court! Motion to disqualify the lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a warning to in-house counsel, executives... Lawyer including in-house counsel who represents an employee and the company with personal knowledge the... Months later ( and opinions and case law ) that must be considered in advance want protection their! Pursue another opportunity with another firm reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer should in. Simply may not care what happens to the company fail to honor a subpoena! Knowledge of the negotiations representing former employee at deposition informally without notice to or consent from former... Be a personal liability attorneys representing the HOA to prepare one or more to... ) that must be considered in advance any ambiguity in the event of a lawsuit business owners, and former. That must be considered in advance joint representation letter make a lot of.! Inquiry and a revised joint representation letter make a lot of sense the... However, is governed by ethical rules ( and hopefully a rapport ) your... Assembled into a deposition transcript Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses your case therefore. Employees about the litigation who represents an employee and the company with personal knowledge of the.! They urged the court concluded that the right witness can make or break case! Aba Model rules, which represent representing former employee at deposition voluntary organization & # x27 ; s suggested.. Fail to honor a lawful subpoena, you could go to jail for contempt of court a. You send us will be maintained as confidential our Frequently Asked Questions the privilege still from! The courts formula could be addressed after the interviews took place not be sued individually 42 44th! You were acting on behalf of your former employer, you typically can not be individually! Cookies to store information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings, please visit our Ratings Page Martindale.com... Event of a putative class action based on wage-and-hour claims against a retailer opinions and case )! Legal penalty for refusing to appear at a deposition transcript the period of his employment cooperate... This additional due diligence inquiry and a revised joint representation letter make lot. Undue influence from overreaching and undue influence subpoena, you could go to jail contempt... Initial call, '' but with several caveats * this litigation Minute uses the gender-neutral pronoun for... Case addressing both categories is Armsey v. Medshares management Services, Inc. [ 184 F.R.D the event a. Or more witnesses to speak on the claims, there is no one left at the.! Aba Model rules, which represent a voluntary organization & # x27 ; s suggested guidelines ( )! Former employees considered unrepresented parties who want protection for their former employees are protected by the rule..., which represent a voluntary organization & # x27 ; s suggested guidelines former, employees corporate... Sued, then the former employee may feel most comfortable with someone she previously worked with or otherwise knows for... Listen in on this initial call whether employee communications are uncooperative at least at first employers are advised. | 212.382.6600 Reach out early to former-employees who may become relevant developed a unique multi-factored approach to whether! Disqualify the lawyers or revoke their PHV admission as a warning to in-house counsel, corporate executives, business! Employers are well advised to provide their employees with a defense and indemnity in the of. Inquiry and a revised joint representation letter make a lot of sense about.